Fail Grade and Reassessment
Seldom assigned, this grade represents a failure of achievement and/or commitment that results in the student falling below the minimum standards of the course. This grade will be assigned to all those students whose performance is below the minimum required which is two standard deviations from the mean of his/her section. [minimum required = mean – (standard deviation*2)].
When students receive a Fail in a course, they have the opportunity to present themselves for reassessment in order to earn the necessary credits toward graduation. The reassessment, including content and evaluation, is the responsibility of the course professor in agreement with the Academic Course Coordinator (appointed by the Dean of Faculty). The re-sit should take place between 5 and 10 working days after the date of the review session,
giving the student sufficient time to prepare for the reassessment of the failed subject. Grades for the reassessment are limited to a Low Pass and Fail, both of which fall outside of the normal grade distribution. In the case of a Low Pass, the student receives the corresponding academic credit (sessions/weight) associated with the Low Pass grade that carries a grade point of 1.0. In the case of a Fail, the student would be required to leave the IMBA Program for failure to meet the academic requirements of the program.
Review sessions
As soon as the final grade of a course is published, students will be informed about the date, time and place via IE Campus (under the section page on the left-hand menu). This session must take place within 10 business days of the grade being published. During this review session, students have the right to receive feedback from the professor in order to better understand the rationale behind their evaluation. If during the review session the student is contesting a grade, the professor may review the entire work, not only the assignment in question, and the final grade can be adjusted accordingly (either up or down). If following the review session the student believes there has been an objective error in the evaluation of their performance, he/she may proceed with a formal grade appeal to the Vice Dean of the Program.
The student can ask for a review of the qualification obtained in the final Master’s exam. In the case that the final Master’s exam is group work with individual assessment, the request will have to be made by all the members of the group to the Program Director, who will provide the feedback.
After receiving feedback, the student/group may request a review session with the Examining Board Secretary. During the review session, if a student/group does not agree with a section of their grade, the Examining Board Secretary may review all of their work and adjust the final grade accordingly – up or down.
If, after the review session, the student / group is not satisfied, they may appeal to the Vice Dean within a maximum period of 3 days after the review session – by the process described in a previous paragraph.
The arguments that support the appeal must be submitted in writing using the existing specific questionnaire to make the appeal.